Percent Funded Status Versus Timing

Percent Funded status is commonly measured as Poor (below 30%), Fair (between 30% and 70%), or Strong (above 70%).

However, there is a quirk in this gauge, making these statuses questionable.

A Poor status can be superior to a Strong status at different points in time.

As an example, let’s consider a million-dollar roof with a 30-year useful life and assume a Strong Percent Funded status a year before roof replacement and a Poor Percent Funded status a year after roof replacement.

Strong Versus Poor Percent Funded Status Comparison

The Fully Funded Balances (FFBs) a year before and a year after replacing the $1,000,000 roof are $966,667 and $33,333, respectively. With a Strong 70% status a year before replacement and a Poor 30% status a year after replacement, the reserve fund balances are $676,667 and $10,000, respectively, a year before and after replacement.

These reserve fund balances equate to pre- and post-replacement deficits of $290,000 and $23,333, respectively.

What is immediately shocking here is that there is only 1 year to make up the huge $290,000 deficit, while there are 29 years to make up the much smaller $23,333 deficit.

In this example, the Poor status is clearly superior to the Strong status because there are 29 years to recover the smaller deficit, rather than only 1 year to recover the larger deficit.

Strong Versus Poor Percent Funded Status Comparison Before & After Roof Replacement
Percent Funded Status CRC UL RL FFB Reserve Fund Balance Deficit Years to Make Up Deficit
70% Strong $1,000,000 30 1 $966,667 $676,667 $290,000 1
30% Poor $1,000,000 30 29 $33,333 $10,000 $23,333 29

CRC = Current Replacement Cost,
UL = Useful Life,
RL = Remaining Life,
FFB = Fully Funded Balance

Even if the Percent Funded level is 90% the year before replacement, the deficit is still a substantial $96,667, equivalent to approximately 3 years of normal contributions towards this roof replacement.